Let’s find some more offbeat boy names for Ralphie‘s new brother!
Sara writes:
Oh, Name Sage, please help!
Two years ago, we named our first son Ralph. We loved how it was uncommon but how it still felt familiar. We also wanted a one-syllable first name to go with our longer last name. My husband and I joked that Ralph felt like an approachable person, someone you might meet drinking in a bowling alley. We call him Ralphie often, but we love that his given name is complete and stands on its own with one syllable.
Now Ralph is getting a brother in a few months. We can’t come up with another name that has the same offbeat, but unpretentious and approachable, feel, while still being one-syllable. The front-runner has been Gus, which we love, but I hesitate because it doesn’t feel complete— like people would always ask if Gus was short for another name. I know that might not bother most people but it bothers me.
I also really don’t like newer names or gender-neutral names.
Other considerations are Roy, Wade, Paul, Clark, and Mark. But nothing feels totally right.
Any guidance would be super helpful. I am seriously considering naming this second baby Ralph 2!
The Name Sage replies:
Let me say that I am delighted – thrilled! – that you named your son Ralph. It’s handsome and traditional, and so very underused.
Finding the perfect name for your first child can make naming siblings even harder. We get stuck trying to replicate the exact same qualities that make that first choice so great.
That’s why I’m making two lists.
First up: names that fit the Ralph 2 criteria in every way: traditional, one-syllable, offbeat, approachable.
But for the second list, I’m breaking some of those rules.
So often, the key to getting unstuck is figuring out what’s different this time around.
Allowing yourself to explore names that don’t check every box is a good exercise. It helps you identify your non-negotiables, but can also open your eyes to some new names that might be perfect with Ralph – even if they don’t quite fit the pattern.
Floyd – Floyd – and cousin Lloyd – both sound like brothers for Ralph. Bonus? You might meet somebody’s grandpa with these names, but they’re distinctive and different for children born today.
Frank – Sinatra lends Frank a certain kind of forever cool. But the name is in the same bowling league as Ralph.
George – Despite so many kings George, this regal name remains down-to-Earth. Maybe it’s the meaning: farmer.
Hugh – Like some of the names on your maybe list, Hugh sounds brief. But it offers cuddly nickname option Hugo, so maybe that tips the scales in the name’s favor?
Ike – It makes us think of President Dwight Eisenhower, but Ike is originally short for Isaac. That could put it in the same camp as Gus, but I think Ike works very nicely as a stand-alone name.
Chester – A 1910s favorite, Chester shortens to jazzy, friendly Chet. They’re a perfect retro pair.
Howard – Because Ralphie and Howie together? I swoon.
Oscar – In many ways, Oscar is Ralph’s opposite. It hovers around the Top 200 in the US. And it comes in at two syllables, without an obvious nickname. But something about Oscar just feels like a brother for Ralph.
Rufus – Do you mind repeating initials? Because I think Rufus and Ralph make for unforgettable names individually, and they’re even better together.
Woodrow – Strictly speaking, this is a surname. But it made the jump to first name status ages ago, thanks to US president Woodrow Wilson. Toy Story helps transform Woody into an accessible rarity, every bit as friendly as Ralph.
As much as I like lots of the names on the Ralph 2 list, I’m even more tempted by possibilities like Chester and Howard. If Frank, Floyd, and company don’t hit the mark, then maybe it’s time to move on to something just slightly different.
Readers, let’s hear from you! What matters most, maintaining the pattern? Or finding the perfect name?